Search This Blog

Wednesday, April 06, 2016

A Man of Genius by Lynn Rosen

A Man of Genius  by Lynn Rosen 

An ambiguous tale with two sources, Carlyle Richards and Arthur Dolinger.  

Arthur Dolinger, a senior partner in his law firm, assigns Carlyle Richards to convince the widow of a revered architect to have an unexpected codicil to his will read aloud.  So far, the widow has refused, asserting that her husband's original will (which leaves his famous home Upuna Rose to her) is all that matters.

Unhappy with her assignment in the first place, Carlyle finds herself enchanted with Upuna Rose and the beauty of its style and surroundings.  She is also instantly drawn to the widow, but cannot understand Elizabeth's reluctance to have the codicil read aloud to her.  If terms aren't met, Elizabeth will forfeit Upuna Rose. 

Some years later, Carlyle finds Arthur Dolinger seated alone at a business retreat and tells him that she is still uneasy about the entire situation that transpired.  She tells her story, and  intrigued and curious, Arthur decides to delve into his own memories and attempt to solve some of the mysteries surrounding Samuel Grafton-Hall and the codicil to his will.  Was a murder actually committed?

The descriptions of the novel refer to moral decisions and whether or not genius should be excused of crime.  By genius alone should consideration be granted?  While it is true that moral questions concerning excusable genius are called into play and beg deliberation and reflection, I found the most interesting questions to be more in the line of "are things done to us?" or "do we allow (or choose, as Arthur mentions) these things to be done?"   

It is a fascinating novel, dealing with the egotistical, but visionary architect Samuel Grafton-Hall, his wives and lover, his hubris and self-inflated personality, his total inability to consider others, except in relation to himself.  Help or hindrance?  He has no deeper emotional connection to another human being.

The story moves from past to present, focusing on two characters at a time (for the most part) with one character always being the flamboyant, egotistical Samuel.

I think it is inescapable that Rosen drew partly from events in the life of Frank Lloyd Wright, but Samuel Grafton-Hall's story is more Gothic.  

I was engrossed from beginning to end.  User or used, who lived, who died, status quo or criminal liability?   

Scheduled for April 6, 2016.

NetGalley/Una Publications

Psychological/Mystery.  April 15, 2016.  Print length:  246 pages.
      

8 comments:

  1. This sounds like something that I would enjoy. Adds another to the wishlist and groans! - Still, at least I'm easy to buy presents for.
    Lynn :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. :) The story develops in an interesting manner, and Arthur Dolinger admits he is an unreliable narrator

      Delete
  2. This sounds like it offers some good food for thought, Jenclair. I don't know that this is a book I would have picked up to read, but you have me curious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I started it and put it aside, not knowing if I would come back to it. Once the two versions of events (Carlyle's more recent experience and Arthur's memories of his relationship with the architect) got going, I was hooked.

      Delete
  3. Great review! Interesting premise. I had seen this one on NetGalley but for some reason didn't connect that this was influenced by Wright's life.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It never says that, but I noted similarities early on. The lack of a degree, the 3 wives, the money problems, and more. The book is definitely fiction, but Wright had to have been the inspiration.

      Delete
  4. Interesting premise and characters! I think I'd probably miss this book if I haven't read your review, Jenclair. Must be the cover. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I didn't really like the cover either. It is a painting by James Carroll Beckwith titled Fame, and it does work with the content. However, I agree that it could put people off the book--it almost did me. And the opening didn't pull me in either. I had to give it a second chance before I got really involved. But it was worth it. :)

      Delete